Which three are impacts of sequence numbers on rules and rule sets if parallel execution is selected as the rule set calculation option?

The selection of sequence numbers in the context of rules and rule sets within parallel execution significantly influences how calculations are organized and executed. When parallel execution is employed as the calculation option, sequence numbers are critical in determining the order and manner in which rules and rule sets are processed.

The correct choice highlights that rules are calculated in the order defined by their sequence numbers. This means that if a rule has a lower sequence number, it will be executed before those with higher numbers. This sequencing ensures that dependencies between rules are respected, allowing for smooth and logical progression through the calculation process.

The structured approach of sequence numbers is essential in complex calculations where order matters—certain computations may rely on the outcomes of previous calculations. By adhering to sequence numbering, the system guarantees that any dependencies are satisfied before a rule is executed, preventing errors or inconsistencies during the calculation phase. Therefore, this structured ordering is fundamental to ensuring accurate and reliable results within the engine's execution framework.

In contrast, the other options describe aspects that either contradict the fundamental behavior of how sequence numbers work with rule sets or provide misleading interpretations of parallel execution characteristics. Each sequence number’s role is pivotal in defining not only the sequence of execution but also the grouping of rules and their independence or dependencies, which